Download the Why Every Vote Counts Manifesto

Does My Vote Really Count? Is it Worth it?

These are questions with a long history of debate, but the answer
to both of those questions is YES—Every Vote Counts!

“Why Every Vote Counts“…explains why you need to show up and voice your opinion on election day.
The right to vote is one of our most important civil liberties and those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must support the vehicle of freedom. Voting is an obligation that protects the liberties we enjoy.

Who Should Read This Report?

“The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.”
– John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1917-1963)

Political Lexicon

The following is a glossary of terms from U.S. Politics

Absentee VotingAbsentee voting allows voters who cannot come to polling places
a means to cast a ballot. A variety of circumstances, including residency
abroad, illness, travel or military service, could prevent voters from coming to
the polls on Election Day. Absentee ballots permit registered voters to mail in
their votes. The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, a federal
law, governs absentee voting in presidential elections. Absentee voting rules
for all other elections are set by the states, and vary. In Oregon, all
elections are conducted by mail, but voters have the option of voting in person
at county polling stations.
Ballota piece of paper listing the
candidates running for office. A ballot is used to cast a vote. The word ballot comes from the Italian word, ballota (meaning “little
colored ball”), because votes were originally cast using balls. In ancient
Athens, each voter was given a small clay ball, and the voter would drop the
ball into their candidate’s clay pot, or ballot box. The practice of using balls
to cast votes continued up until the late 19th century, well after more advanced
voting machines were invented.
Ballot Boxa box in which votes are placed.
Ballot InitiativeBallot initiatives are an
example of direct democracy in the United States, in which citizens may propose
legislative measures or amendments to state constitutions. Some initiatives
propose the repeal of existing state laws. States vary in the number of
signatures they require to place an initiative on the ballot. These initiatives
(also called “propositions” in some states) are subject to approval, by a simple
majority in most, but not all cases.
BlackballIn the 19th century, to vote for someone’s
membership in to a secret society, a voter was given two balls: a white ball and
a black ball. To vote in favor of the candidate’s membership, the voter would
drop the white ball into a box. To vote against a candidate, the voter would
deposit the black ball. The term is still used today to mean to exclude
someone.
Beauty ContestA preliminary vote usually
taken early in the electoral process within a party; it expresses a non-binding
preference for one or another of the party’s candidates.
Bill of Rightsthe Bill of
Rights is the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution. These amendments were
ratified on December 15, 1791. The Bill of Rights was proposed to ensure that
individuals would have civil rights and could avoid the tyranny of an
overly-powerful central government.
Bipartisansupported by members of the two
major political parties (the Democrats and the Republicans).
Bicameralconsisting of two legislative
branches, like the US Congress, which consists of the House of Representatives
and the Senate.
Blanket Primarya primary election in which the
names of all the candidates for all the parties are on one ballot.
BlogShort for weblog, a blog is an unedited online
journal. Candidates use blogs to tell users of their Web sites about their
activities. Others use blogs to follow the development of campaign issues or
events. Political blogs are created by “bloggers,” individuals who post
commentary and news from their own perspective. Political blogs, like blogs in
general, reflect a broad spectrum of opinion.
Blue StateBlue state is a term used to refer to a U.S. state where the majority
of voters usually support Democratic candidates.
Buckley v. ValeoThe legal challenge Buckley v.
Valeo
resulted in a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision on campaign
finance law that upheld the Federal Election Campaign Act’s financial disclosure
requirements, contribution limits and provision for public funding of
presidential election campaigns. The court struck down spending limits in the
law, except for the limits accepted voluntarily by presidential candidates who
receive public funds. Thus, the ruling allowed for unlimited spending by
congressional candidates (they do not receive public funds) and by persons or
groups who campaign for or against a candidate, but who do not coordinate their
activities with any candidate or campaign. The ruling also said that candidates
who do not receive public money do not have to limit campaign spending of their
own personal funds.
Butterfly Ballota type of paper ballot in which the
actual voting is done by the central fold of a two-page, pamphlet-like ballot
(the two open pages are like a butterfly’s wings; the voting is done where the
butterfly’s body would be).
Campaigna series of political actions
(like advertisements, public appearances, and debates) that are used to help a
candidate get elected to office.
Candidatea person who is running for an
office.
CaucusA caucus is a meeting at the local level in
which registered members of a political party in a city, town or county gather
to express support for a candidate. For statewide or national offices, those
recommendations are combined to determine the state party nominee. The term also
is applied to a group of party members that meets to plan policy. Two well-known
examples of such groups are the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus, whose members discuss and advance the interests of their
respective constituencies.
Chada tiny bit of paper
that is punched from a ballot using a punch-type mechanical voting machine.
ChallengerA challenger is a candidate running
against a person who currently holds the position (the incumbent).
Closed PrimaryCandidates from the two major
political parties (Democratic and Republican) compete to be their party’s
nominee for an office in a primary election. Closed primaries are restricted to
voters registered as a member of the party holding the election. Unaffiliated
voters receive ballots for other measures and nonpartisan contests that occur on
the same date.
CoattailsThe expression “coattails” is an allusion
to the rear panels (“tails”) of a man’s coat. In American politics, it refers to
the ability of a popular officeholder or candidate for office, on the strength
of his or her own popularity, to increase the chances for victory of other
candidates of the same political party. This candidate is said to carry others
to victory on his or her coattails.
Congressthe US Congress,
which makes the country’s laws, is divided into the Senate and the House of
Representatives. There are currently 100 Senators (2 from each state) and 435
members of the House of Representatives (Representatives are divided by
population among the states, with each state having at least 1 representative).
Congressional Districtan
area within a state from which a member of the House of Representatives is
elected. There are 435 Congressional districts. Each district has about 570,000
people. Seats (positions) in the House of Representatives are reapportioned
every 10 years; since the number of Representatives is set to 435, some areas
lose Representatives and others gain some.
Conservativepeople who generally like to
uphold current conditions and oppose changes. Conservatives are often referred
to as the right wing.
ConstituencyThe people a government official
represents make up his or her constituency. The term is sometimes is used to
refer only to those individuals who voted to elect the official. The president’s
constituency is composed of all Americans; a mayor’s constituency is the people
who reside in the town or city.
ConventionIn presidential election years,
after the conclusion of state primaries and caucuses, the political parties
gather to select a presidential nominee – usually the candidate who secured the
support of the most convention delegates, based on victories in primary
elections. The presidential nominee usually chooses a running mate to be the
candidate for vice president, but the presidential nominee can throw open the
vice presidential selection process to the convention delegates without making a
recommendation.
Convention BounceAn increase in a
presidential candidate’s popularity, as indicated by public-opinion polls, in
the days immediately following his or her nomination for office at the
Republican or Democratic national conventions.
DebateA structured discussion involving
two or more opposing sides of an issue is a debate. In American politics in
recent years, debates have come to be associated with televised programs at
which candidates present their own and their party’s views, in response to
questions from the media or members of the audience. Debates also may be held
via radio, the Internet or at a community meeting place. They can be held among
those who seek elective office at all levels of government.
Delegatea person who is chosen to
represent a local political party at a political convention.
Democrata person who
belongs to the Democratic political party.
Democratic Partya major US
political party. The symbol of the Democratic party is the donkey. The first
Democratic US President was Andrew
Jackson.
Democracya form of government in which
people hold the power, either by voting for measures directly or by voting for
representatives who vote for them. The word democracy comes
from the Greek language; in Greek, demos
means “people” and kratos mean “power.” In a democracy, the power of the
government is in the hands of its people.
Divided GovernmentA situation in which the U.S. president is a member of one political
party and at least one chamber of Congress (either the Senate or the House of
Representatives) is controlled by the opposite party is called a divided
government. This situation also can exist at the state level, with one party
controlling the governorship and another controlling the state legislature.
Divided government occurs frequently in the U.S. political system.
Electiona process in which people vote to
choose a leader or to decide an issue.

Election Assistance

Commission

Established by the Help
America Vote Act of 2002, the Election Assistance Commission serves primarily as
a national clearinghouse and resource for information on elections. It also
reviews federal election administration and procedures.
Electoral CollegeThe president and vice president are selected through the
electoral college system, which gives each state the same number of electoral
votes as it has members of Congress. The District of Columbia also gets three
electoral votes. Of the total 538 votes, a candidate for president must receive
270 to win.
Executive Branchthe part
of the US government that administers the laws and other affairs of the
government; it includes the President (also called the Chief Executive), the
President’s staff, executive agencies (the Office of Management and Budget, the
National Security Council, etc.) and Cabinet departments (like the State
Department, the Dept. of Defense, the Dept. of Agriculture, etc.).
Exit Pollan informal poll taken as people
leave the voting booth. Exit polls are used to predict the outcome of the
election before the polls are closed.
Favorite SonsFor decades, in a practice lasting well
into the 1960s, governors, senators and other prominent figures filed as
presidential candidates in their home states only, won party primaries and then
led delegations to the nominating convention. Historically, “favorite sons”
influenced platforms and the process by trading their delegate votes for
concessions from front-running candidates. The term also is used more broadly to
describe a state’s most illustrious politicians.
Federal Election Campaign
Act
(FECA)
The 1971 law that governs the financing of federal elections, the
Federal Election Campaign was amended in 1974, 1976 and 1979. The act requires
candidates and political committees to disclose the sources of their funding and
how they spend their money; it regulates the contributions received and
expenditures made during federal election campaigns; and it governs the public
funding of presidential elections.
Federal Election
Commission
(FEC)
The Federal Election
Commission is an independent regulatory agency charged with administering and
enforcing federal campaign finance law. The FEC consists of six commissioners
appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate. The FEC
was established by the 1974 amendment of the Federal Election Campaign Act of
1971.
Front-loadingThe practice of scheduling state
party caucuses and state primary elections earlier and earlier in advance of the
general election is called front-loading. By moving their primaries to early
dates, states hope to lend decisive momentum to one or two presidential
candidates and thus have disproportionate influence on each party’s nomination.
“Rear-loading” refers to the intense activity at the end of the yearlong cycle
— just prior to the election — which includes a series of nationally televised
debates, a flurry of television ads and extensive campaign travel on the part of
the presidential candidates.
Front RunnerA candidate in any election
or nomination process who is considered most popular or most likely to win is
called the front runner.
General Electionan election that is being held
throughout the country on the same day.
Gerrymanderinga process in which a voting
district is broken up or the physical boundaries of a voting district are
changed in order to make it easier for one political party to win future
elections. The term gerrymander was coined in 1812 when a county in
Massachusetts was redistricted into a salamander-like shape by Gov. Elbridge
Gerry for political purposes. His last name was combined with the word
salamander to get “gerrymander.”
Hanging Chada chad is a tiny bit of paper that is
punched from a ballot using a punch-type mechanical voting machine. A hanging
chad is a chad that did not completely detach from the ballot. When there is a
hanging chad, that vote may not be counted correctly.
Hard Money / Soft MoneyHard money and soft money are terms used to differentiate between
campaign funding that is, and is not, regulated under federal campaign finance
law. Hard money describes donations by individuals and groups made directly to
political candidates running for federal office. Such contributions are
restricted by law. Soft money refers to donations not regulated by law that can
be spent only on civic activities such as voter-registration drives,
party-building activities, administrative costs and in support of state and
local candidates. “Soft money” contributions, by law, may not be used to support
directly a candidate for federal office. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2003 upheld
congressional restrictions passed in 2002 on soft money contributions.
Hatch ActThe Hatch Act places
restrictions on political activity by employees of the executive branch of the
U.S. federal government, District of Columbia government, and state and local
employees who work in connection with federally funded programs. Under the act,
employees are permitted to contribute to a candidate’s campaign, but are
restricted from using official authority to influence an election, including
soliciting or receiving political contributions, and engaging in political
activity while on duty, which includes wearing political buttons. Employees may
run for office in a nonpartisan election, such as many school board elections,
but are prohibited from running in a partisan election.
Help America Vote
Act
(HAVA)
Congress passed HAVA to address voting problems encountered in the 2000
presidential election. The act encourages state and local governments to
eliminate punch-card and lever voting machines. Under HAVA, states have received
$2.9 billion since 2003 to improve their elections processes. The law also
established the Election Assistance Commission to provide support to the
administration of federal elections, as well as election laws and programs.
Horse RaceUsed as a metaphor for an
election campaign, “horse race” is used to describe a close contest and conveys
the feeling of excitement that people experience when watching a sporting event.
House of Representativesthe House of Representatives is part of Congress; they propose and vote on
legislation (laws). There are 435 members of the House of Representatives
(divided by population among the states, with each state having at least 1
representative). There are 435 Congressional districts. Each district has about
570,000 people. Seats (positions) in the House of Representatives are
reapportioned every 10 years; since the number of Representatives is set to 435,
some areas lose Representatives and others gain some. Representatives are
elected to a term of 2 years.
IncumbentAn individual currently
holding a position is the incumbent. Historically, incumbents have enjoyed a
better-than-average chance of being re-elected.
IndependentA candidate or voter not
affiliated with a particular political party is termed an
independent.
Judicial BranchThe part of
the US government that settles disputes and administers justice. The judicial
branch is made up of the court system, including US District Courts, many
Federal courts, the US Court of Appeals (also called the Federal Circuit
Courts), and the Supreme Court.
Lame DuckThe term lame duck refers to an elected official who has lost an
election, or soon will be leaving office, during the period between the election
and the date a successor will take over. Such an individual is in a weakened
position politically due to the impending expiration of his or her term.
LandslideA victory in which one candidate’s votes
far surpass those of other candidates is called a landslide.
Legislative Branchthe part
of the US government that makes the laws and appropriates funds. The Legislative
Branch includes the US House of Representative and Senate (plus congressional
staffs and committees) plus support agencies (like the General Accounting
Office, the Congressional Budget Office, the Library of Congress, etc.).
Liberalpeople who generally like to
reform current conditions. Liberals are often referred to as the left wing.
Libertariana person who
belongs to the Libertarian political party.
Lobbyistpeople who are associated with
groups (like labor unions, corporations, etc.) and who try to persuade members
of the government (like members of Congress) to enact legislation that would
benefit their group.
Majoritymore than half of the votes.
Matching Funds or
Public Funding
Public money can be given to
presidential candidates that “matches” funds they have raised privately from
individuals. Contributions from individuals in which the aggregate amount
contributed by the individual is $250 or less are eligible to be matched on a
dollar- for-dollar basis from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. This fund
includes proceeds from the voluntary check-off of $3 per person from income tax
returns of eligible taxpayers.
McCain-Feingold LawFormally titled the Bipartisan
Campaign Reform Act, the McCain-Feingold Law is named after its two chief Senate
sponsors, John McCain, a Republican from Arizona, and Russell Feingold, a
Democrat from Wisconsin, who sought to remove “soft money” as an influence on
candidates running for federal office. The law eliminated “loopholes” (or
legislative oversights) that in the past allowed the use of soft money to aid
candidates running for federal office.
midterm electiona general election
that does not coincide with a presidential election year, but occurs two years
into the term of a president. In a midterm election, some members of the US
Senate, all members of the House of Representatives, and many state and local
positions are voted on.
Motor-Voter Billa bill passed by Congress in 1993
that lets US citizens register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.
Negative AdsNegative advertisements that
try to persuade voters to choose a candidate by making the opposing candidate
look bad, by attacking either the opponent’s character or record on the issues.
NomineeA person selected by others
for election to office is the nominee. Nominees may be selected in primary
elections or caucuses. When only one candidate from a party has filed to run for
a political office, that candidate becomes the party’s nominee without any
further selection process.
Open PrimaryAn open primary is one in which
all registered voters may vote, regardless of whether they are registered as
Democrats, Republicans or Independents.
PlatformIn the context of U.S.
presidential politics, platform refers to a political party’s formal written
statement of its principles and goals, put together and issued during the
presidential nomination process and subject to approval affirmed during the
party’s national political convention.
PluralityA plurality is one method of
identifying the winning candidate in an election. A plurality occurs when the
votes received by a candidate are greater than those received by any opponent
but can be less than a majority of the total vote. For example, if one candidate
receives 30 percent of the votes, a second candidate also receives 30 percent
and a third receives 40 percent, the third candidate could win the election by a
plurality of the votes.
Political Action
Committee
(PAC)
PACs are
political committees not related directly to a political party, but rather
affiliated with corporations, labor unions or other organizations. The
committees contribute money to candidates and engage in other election-related
activities so as to promote specific legislative agendas. Funds are gathered by
voluntary contributions from members, employees or shareholders. PACs have
increased significantly in influence and number in recent years: in 1976, there
were 608 PACs, and in 2006, there are about 4,600.
Political GridlockIn politics, when one side (or, in some
cases, more than one side) in a political matter manages to stall things so
there is no room for maneuver or compromise and nothing can be accomplished, the
situation is described as gridlock.
Political Partyan organized group of people with
common values and goals, who try to get their candidates elected to office. The
Democrats and the Republicans are the two major political parties in the USA
today.
Politiciana person who is running for
office or has won an election and is already in office.
Poll/PollingA public opinion poll is
created when a polling firm contacts a sample group of randomly selected
citizens and asks a series of standard questions. If executed properly, the
poll’s data reflect the range of opinions and the portion of the population that
holds them in a manner representative of the full population. Public opinion
polls provide an idea of what many Americans think about various candidates and
issues.
Poll Taxmoney that must be paid in order to
vote. There used to be poll taxes in some places in the USA; this tax kept many
poor people from voting since they could not afford to pay the tax. The 24th
Amendment to the Constitution (ratified in 1964) made poll taxes illegal.
Popular Votethe result of the votes of the
eligible voters. The winner of the popular vote usually wins the election (but
not always – sometimes the outcome of the vote of the Electoral College is
different).
Precinctthe smallest geographic area in
US voting subdivisions, in which local party officials are elected. A precinct
usually has from 200 to 1,000 voters in it. Each precinct has an elected
precinct captain (the neighborhood party leader). The purpose of a precinct is
vote for a candidate and to elect delegates who will go to the city or county
convention, and relay the precinct’s vote for that candidate.
Primary ElectionA state-level election in which
voters choose a candidate affiliated with a political party to run against a
candidate who is affiliated with another political party in a later, general
election. A primary may be either “open” — allowing any registered voter in a
state to vote for a candidate to represent a political party, or “closed” —
allowing only registered voters who belong to a particular political party to
vote for a candidate from that party.
Protest VoteA vote for a third-party candidate
made, not to elect that candidate, but to indicate displeasure with the
candidates of the two major political parties.
Push PollingA public-opinion polling technique that is used to test possible
campaign themes by asking very specific questions about an issue or a candidate
is call push polling.
RedistrictingThe process of redrawing the geographic boundaries of
congressional districts, the electoral districts within states from which
members of the House of Representatives are elected, is called redistricting.
Both Democrats and Republicans at the state level compete to get hold of the
legal and political mechanisms of redistricting — usually by controlling the
state legislature. By doing so, they can redraw boundaries of congressional
districts in ways that will lend an electoral advantage to their own
party.
Red StateRed state refers to a U.S. state where the majority of voters support
Republican candidates.
ReferendumA measure referred to voters by
a state legislature proposing that specific legislation be approved or rejected
is a referendum. The terms referendum, proposition and ballot initiative
frequently are used interchangeably.
Representative Democracya government in which the adult
citizens of the country vote to elect the country’s leaders. These elected
leaders make the governmental decisions.
Republicana person who belongs to
the Republican political party.
Republican Partya major US
political party also known as the G.O.P. (standing for the Grand Old Party). The
symbol of the Republican party is the elephant. The Republican party was founded
as an anti-slavery party in the mid 1800s. The first Republican US President was Abraham
Lincoln.
Senatethe Senate is part
of Congress. Senators propose and vote on legislation (laws). There are 100
members of the Senate (two Senators for each state). Senators are elected to a
term of 6 years.
Single-Member DistrictSingle-member district describes the current arrangement for electing
national and state legislators in the United States in which one candidate is
elected in each legislative district; the winner is the candidate with the most
votes. The “single-member” system allows only one party to win in any given
district. Under the proportional system popular in Europe, much larger districts
are used and several members are elected at one time, based on the proportion of
votes their parties receive.
Soft Moneymoney that is given to a political
party but is not given specifically to support a particular candidate. This
money is supposed to be used for purposes such as voter registration drives,
administrative costs and general political party expenses, but is often used by
the parties to help particular candidates.
Sound BiteA sound bite is a brief, very quotable remark by a candidate for
office that is repeated on radio and television news programs.
Spin DoctorA media adviser or political consultant employed by a campaign to
ensure that a candidate receives the best possible publicity in any given
situation is called a spin doctor. When these media advisers practice their
craft, they are said to be “spinning” or putting “spin” on a situation or event
to present it as favorably as possible to their side.
Straw VoteAn unofficial vote that is used
either to predict the outcome of an official vote, or to measure the relative
strength of candidates for office in a future election is called straw poll or
straw vote. A good showing in a straw vote can give a candidate a boost, but
does not necessarily predict later success.
Stump SpeechThe “standard” speech of a
candidate for office — the one he or she is most likely to use, perhaps with
slight variations, on normal occasions.
Suffragethe right or privilege of voting.
Suffragettea person who campaigned for
the right of women to vote. The 19th amendment (ratified in 1920) to the US
Constitution gave women the right to vote.
Super TuesdayWidespread
use of the phrase “Super Tuesday” dates from 1988, when a group of Southern
states banded together to hold the first large and effective regional group of
primaries in order to boost the importance of Southern states in the
presidential nomination process and lessen the impact of early votes in the New
Hampshire primary and Iowa caucus. Today, the meaning of the phrase is blurred,
a reflection of the fact that during the presidential primary season there may
be several groups of state primaries in various regions falling on one or more
Tuesdays. These groupings are important because the weight of such a large,
simultaneous vote tends to make or break would-be presidential nominees since so
many convention delegates are selected at once.
Swing VotersVoters not loyal to a particular
political party sometimes can determine the outcome of an election by “swinging”
one way or the other on an issue or candidate, often reversing their choices in
a subsequent election.
Taxpayer Check-Off
System
The taxpayer check-off system allows U.S. taxpayers to contribute $3
of their annual federal income tax payment to a public fund for financing
presidential elections. To contribute, taxpayers simply check a box on their tax
return that says that they want to participate in this system. Making the
contribution does not raise or lower an individual’s taxes; it simply deposits
$3 of the tax payment into the presidential election campaign
fund.
Term LimitsTerm limits involve restricting the
number of years an officeholder or lawmaker may serve in a particular office.
There is a term limit for the U.S. president, who may serve no more than two
consecutive terms, or eight years total. There are no term limits for those who
serve in the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives. Some state and local
offices also are subject to terms limits.
Third PartyAny political party that is not one
of the two parties that dominated U.S. politics in the 20th century — the
Republican Party and the Democratic Party — and that receives a base of support
and plays a role in influencing the outcome of an election is referred to as a
third party.
Ticket SplittingVoting for candidates of different political parties in the same
election, for instance, voting for a Democrat for president and a Republican for
senator, is called splitting the ticket. Because these voters support candidates
from more than one political party, they are said to “split” their votes.
Town MeetingA town meeting is an informal
gathering of an officeholder or candidate for office with a group of people,
often local, in which the audience raises questions directly to the officeholder
or candidate.
Tracking SurveyA type of public-opinion poll that allows candidates to follow, or
“track” voters’ sentiments over the course of a campaign is called a tracking
survey. For the initial survey, the pollster interviews the same number of
voters on three consecutive nights — for example, 400 voters a night, for a
total sample of 1,200 people. On the fourth night, the pollster interviews 400
more voters, adds their responses to the poll data, and drops the responses from
the first night. Continuing in this way, the sample rolls along at a constant
1,200 responses drawn from the previous three nights. Over time, the campaign
can analyze the data from the entire survey and observe the effect of certain
events on voters’ attitudes.
US Constitutionthe
official document that is the basis of government and law in the United States.
It was written in 1787, and ratified in 1789. Many amendments have been added
since then.
Votea way to show your preference and
choose elected leaders or decide on initiatives. People can vote by marking a
piece of paper, raising their hand, or filling out a form on a computer.
Voting Bootha small enclosure in which a person
votes.
Voting Machine

a mechanical device used for
voting. There are many different types of voting machines.

  

History of Voting Technology


Since the ancient Greeks and Romans first cast votes by dropping clay marbles into pots, new technologies aimed at improving the voting process have emerged. Voting in the United States has progressed from colored beans to all-electronic machines. As new technology solves old problems new questions and concerns inevitably occur.

1856The Australian state of
Victoria becomes the first place to use uniform official ballots. This style of
paper ballot, later called the Australian Secret Ballot, is printed at the
government’s expense, lists the names of all candidates and issues in a fixed
order, and is counted by hand.
1888Massachusetts becomes the
first state in the U.S. to adopt the Australian Secret Ballot system on a
statewide basis. This voting system is still used in some areas of the country
(approximately 1% of voters cast hand counted paper ballots in the 2004 U.S.
Presidential election).
January 8
1889
Herman Hollerith patents a method of using punched cards to
compile data for the U.S. Census. Although this punch card system
(U.S. Patent 395,782) was not used for voting, the technology laid the
foundation for the punch card voting systems developed in the
1960’s.
November
19, 1889
Jacob H. Myers of Rochester, New York patents the first
mechanical lever voting machine (U.S. Patent 415,549). This technology, later
called the Myers Automatic Booth, prevents over votes, speeds up the vote
counting process, and significantly reduces the chance of dishonest vote
counting because the votes are counted by machine.
1892The Myers Automatic Booth
lever voting machine was first used in 1892 in Lockport, New York… Lever
machines were on the cutting edge of technology, with more moving parts than
almost anything else being made. As such, they were as much of a high-tech
solution to the problem of running an honest election as computer tabulated
punched-cards in the 1960’s or direct-recording electronic voting machines in
the 1990’s.
1930By 1930, lever machines had
been installed in virtually every major city in the United
States.
1962The first use of mark-sense
[optical scan] ballots was in 1962, in Kern City, California, using a mark-sense
system developed by the Norden Division of United Aircraft and the City of Los
Angeles. Development of this 15,000 pound system began in 1958… and the system
remained in use in Orange County for over a decade. The system also saw use in
Oregon, Ohio, and North Carolina.
1964Fulton and DeKalb Counties
in Georgia were the first jurisdictions to use punch cards and computer tally
machines when they adopted the system for the 1964 primary election. In the
November 1964 Presidential election, these two jurisdictions were joined by Lane
County, Oregon, and San Joaquin and Monterey Counties in California, who also
adopted the punch card system.
August
17, 1965
Joseph P. Harris, with the help of William Rouverol, patents
the Votomatic punch card voting system (U.S. Patent 3,201,038). In this system a
voter marks their choice by punching a hole in a prescored card marked with
numbers which correspond to candidates and ballot issues listed in a separate
booklet. The votes are then tabulated by a computerized counting machine. The
Votomatic was an improvement upon the punch card system used the year before and
eventually becomes the most commonly used type of punch card voting
system.
Feb. 19,
1974
Richard H. McKay, along with Paul Ziebold, James Kirby, Douglas
Hetzel, and James Syndacker, patents a direct recording electronic (DRE)
voting machine that becomes the first DRE to be used in a real election. This
push-button machine, commercially named the Video Voter (U.S. Patent
3,793,505), uses projected light and phototransmitors but does not contain a
computer.
1975The Video Voter was first
used in real elections in 1975, in Streamwood and Woodstock Illinois. Following
these demonstrations, several Illinois counties purchased the system and used it
between 1976 and 1980, approximately.
March 1975Roy Saltman prepares the first U.S. government report to evaluate computerized
voting technology. “Effective Use of Computing Technology in Vote-Tallying”
investigates voting system security, design, and functionality, as well as the
ability to conduct audits of election processes and ballot recounts. This paper
initiates the federal Voting Systems Standards program.
May 3,
1977
James O. Narey, with the help of William Saylor, patents
(U.S.Patent 4,021,780) the first model of the modern precinct-based
optical scan systems in use today.
1982In
1982, the AIS [American Information Systems] model 315 central-count ballot
tabulator saw its first official use in several Nebraska counties. In 1997, AIS
was reorganized as Election Systems and Software [ES&S] after a merger with
Business Records Corporation. The AIS model 315 became the first optical scan
system to be widely used throughout the United States.
February 3,
1987
The R.F. Shoup Corporation and Chief Engineer Robert J. Boram patent the Shouptronic ELECTronic voting
machine (U.S. Patent 4,641,240). This push-button machine was one of the first
direct recording electronic voting machines to achieve significant commercial
success.
1988Roy Saltman states in his report
“Accuracy, Integrity, and Security in Computerized Vote-Tallying” that “the use
of pre-scored punch cards contributes to the inaccuracy and to the lack of
confidence. It is generally not possible to exactly duplicate a count obtained
on pre-scored punch cards, given the inherent physical characteristics of these
ballots and variability in the ballot-punching performance of real voters. It is
recommended that the use of pre-scored punch card ballots be ended.” Despite his
warning, use of punch card voting systems continues until widespread problems in
the 2000 U.S. Presidential election prompt these systems to be banned by the
Help America Vote Act of 2002.
1990The Federal
Election Commission (FEC) releases the first set of standards for computer-based
voting systems. The “Performance and Test Standards for Punch card, Marksense
[optical scan], and Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems” are commonly
referred to as the Voting Systems Standards
(VSS).
1996The first governmental election to
be conducted over the Internet in the US was the 1996 Reform Party Presidential
primary, in which Internet voting was offered, along with vote-by-mail and
vote-by-phone, as an option to party members who did not attend the party
convention.
November 7, 2000Problems with punch
card voting systems, particularly in Florida, in the 2000 Presidential Election
between George W. Bush and Al Gore put voting technology in the national
spotlight. Inaccurate registration lists, unclear ballot designs, high numbers
of spoiled ballots, and questions about voter intent on cards where the chad,
the small piece of paper punched out of punch card ballots, was not fully
punched out were among the problems. “Hanging chad,” “dimpled chad,” and
“pregnant chad” are phrases that enter everyday conversation.
2001Faculty from the California Institute of Technology and the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology create the Voting Technology Project in
the wake of the 2000 election to provide strong academic guidance in this
intersection of technology with democracy. They offer several recommendations to
improve election administration for the future in their July, 2001 report
Voting: What Is and What Could Be.
May
2002
The FEC releases an updated version of the standards for
electronic voting systems. The Voting Systems Standards expand on the first set
of standards by focusing on the voting medium instead of specific kinds of
voting systems and addressing accessibility, usability, telecommunications, and
audit trails.
October
29, 2002
President George W. Bush signs the first law to specifically
address voting technology. The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) is “an
act to establish a program to provide funds to States to replace punch card
voting systems, to establish the Election Assistance Commission to assist in the
administration of Federal elections and to otherwise provide assistance with the
administration of certain Federal election laws and programs, to establish
minimum election administration standards for States and units of local
government with responsibility for the administration of Federal elections, and
for other purposes.”The Help America Vote Act of 2002
is signed into law in an effort to improve voting systems across the country.
The law mandates that all polling places have at least one handicap-accessible
voting device, guarantees that any voter not appearing on a registration list
has the right to cast a provisional vote, assures that all voters have the
opportunity to review their selections before casting a ballot, establishes the
Election Assistance Commission, and authorizes $3.9 billion in federal funds for
replacing lever machines and punch card voting systems with either DREs or
optical scan systems with accessible ballot marking devices.
2002Following passage of HAVA, the U.S.
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is
established. The EAC is tasked with providing support and technical guidance on
the administration of federal elections, disbursing the funds allocated under
HAVA, developing a new set of standards, implementing a new program for testing
and certifying voting machines, and serving as a clearinghouse of election
information.
2002Georgia becomes the first
state to implement the use of direct recording electronic voting machines on a
statewide basis, deploying the DREs at the same time in every county and paying
for the implementation with state funds instead of county
funds.
July 23, 2003Computer security experts
Avi Rubin and Dan Wallach, along with graduate students Tadayoshi Kohno and Adam
Stubblefield, evaluate the security of a particular model of electronic voting
machine based on source code they found on the Internet. Their analysis reveals
several vulnerabilities that lead them to conclude these systems should not be
used for federal elections. This critique is the first independent security
analysis to raise concern about DREs and inspires many computer scientists to
join the debate over the use of electronic voting machines.
December 9, 2003The Information Technology
Association of America (ITAA) today announced a group of leading election
systems companies will align with ITAA to form the Election Technology Council
(ETC). ETC members will work together to raise the profile of electronic voting,
identify and address security concerns with electronic voting, develop a code of
ethics for companies in the electronic voting sector, and make recommendations
in the areas of election system standards and
certification.
April 30, 2004Secretary of State
Kevin Shelley decertifies all touch screen electronic voting machines in the
state of California and bans their use in four counties that had been using them
until significant improvements are made to the security of the systems.
May 5, 2004The U.S. Election Assistance
Commission conducts their first public meeting, inviting testimony from a
diversity of experts including election officials, computer scientists,
disability advocates, and voting machine manufacturers.
July 16, 2004Nevada becomes the first state to
mandate that all electronic voting machines used for federal elections be
equipped with printers that produce a voter-verified paper audit trail.
November 2004During the November 2004 General
Election in Carteret County, North Carolina electronic voting machines lost
4,438 votes. The manufacturer, Unilect, claimed the machines could store up to
10,500 votes but they actually only held 3,005 votes. Officials were unaware of
the problem because the machines kept accepting votes after their memory was
full, despite not being able to store them, and those votes were irretrievably
lost.
September 2005The Commission on Federal
Election Reform, chaired by President Jimmy Carter and former U.S. Secretary of
State James Baker, releases a report. Building Confidence in U.S. Elections
makes several recommendations for improving confidence in elections and
modernizing election administration, including a recommendation that all DREs
include voter-verified paper audit trails.
December
2005
Black Box Voting, Inc. sets up a demonstration in Leon County,
Florida in which computer security experts Harri Hursti and Herbert Thompson are
able to hack into the central vote tabulator of an electronic voting system and
change the outcome of a mock election without leaving any trace of their
actions. This exercise demonstrates that the software running electronic voting
systems is vulnerable to tampering.
December
13, 2005
The EAC unanimously adopts the 2005 Voluntary Voting System
Guidelines. These new standards significantly increase security requirements for
voting systems and expand accessibility for disabled individuals, including
opportunities to vote privately and independently. The Guidelines will take
effect in December 2007, at which time all previous standards will become
obsolete.
January 1, 2006Beginning in 2006,
HAVA requires that voting systems notify voters of over votes and permit them to
review their ballots and correct errors before casting their votes…. Also
beginning in 2006, [HAVA requires] that each polling place used in a federal
election have at least one voting machine that is fully accessible for persons
with disabilities.
May 11,
2006
Black Box Voting, Inc. and computer security specialist Harri
Hursti perform a security test on an electronic voting machine delivered to
Emery County, Utah. Hursti shows that the machine contains backdoors that allow
the software to be modified in several ways, including a type of attack in which
the cheating software can be installed months or years before it is
executed.
September 13, 2006Computer security
expert Dr. Edward Felten, with the help of graduate students Ariel Feldman and
J. Alex Halderman, demonstrates that with less than a minute of physical access
to a Diebold electronic voting machine or its PCMCIA memory card, an attacker
could install malware that could steal votes while modifying all records, logs,
and counters to be consistent with the fraudulent vote count it creates and
could also introduce a voting machine virus that spreads from machine to
machine.
September
21, 2006
Maryland Governor Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. (R) publicly urges
voters to vote by absentee paper ballot instead of using the state’s electronic
voting machines in the November 2006 General Election after problems with the
machines emerged during Maryland’s primary. His announcement represents a
complete change of opinion about DREs because Maryland had previously been one
of the first states to implement electronic voting machines on a statewide basis
while Ehrlich was governor in 2002.
November 7,
2006
Because of funding made available and changes mandated by the
Help America Vote Act, use of DREs in the General Election is the highest in
U.S. history. According to Election Data Services, voting system changes this
year were dominated by smaller jurisdictions, where resources to help the
conversion are more limited… Thirty-six percent (36%) of the counties, with
38.4% of the registered voters, will be using direct recording electronic (DRE)
equipment.
January 4 – 2007The New York Times
reports that CIBER Inc., the nation’s largest tester of electronic voting
machine software, was denied accreditation by the EAC in July 2006. Because
CIBER had tested many of the electronic voting systems used in the November 2006
election and its failure to receive accreditation was not disclosed until
January 2007, many election officials unknowingly employed DREs that had not
been tested by an accredited
lab.
Dec. 14, 2007

EVEREST Report Finds DREs Do Not Meet Computer Industry Security Standards

The EVEREST Report of Findings commissioned by Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer L. Brunner finds that all of “the computer-based voting systems in use in Ohio do not meet computer industry security standards and are susceptible to breaches of security that may jeopardize the integrity of the voting process.”

Jan. 2008

Florida Fair Elections Center Reports over 100,000 Florida Votes Not Counted in Nov. 2006

The Florida Fair Elections Center report “Sarasota’s Vanished Votes: An Investigation into the Cause of Uncounted Votes in the 2006 Congressional District 13 Race in Sarasota County, Florida” states that “the iVotronic voting system failed to count over 100,000 votes in various races across the state of Florida in the November 2006 election.”

Nov. 4, 2008

2008 Presidential Election Runs Relatively Smoothly

Despite widely-publicized concerns in the weeks leading up to the 2008 presidential election, election day went rather smoothly. There were reports of glitches with electronic voting machines in Florida, Ohio and Virginia. The lack of a close outcome in the presidential race limited the impact of the minor problems that arose.

June 5, 2009

Sequoia Voting Systems Allows Access to Technical Information about DREs

In response to the controversial Washington, D.C. September primaries where Sequoia machines counted more ballots than there were votes, Sequoia Voting Systems agrees to turn over access to technical information on how the voting machines work and tabulate results. This agreement then allows the D.C. Council to turn over documents such as blueprints of the machines and the source code to computer and legal experts for examination.

Sep. 3, 2009

Diebold, Inc. Sells Election-Systems Business to Election Systems & Software, Inc. for $5 Million

Diebold Inc. sells its U.S. election-systems business to Election Systems & Software Inc. for $5 million, about one-fifth of what it paid 7 years earlier. Diebold, whose primary focus is making ATMs, entered the voting machine business in hopes of capitalizing on rising demand following the disputed 2000 presidential election. The sale drew the concern of lawmaker Charles Schumer (D-NY), Chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, who asked the Department of Justice to review the deal. When approved, Election Systems and Software Inc. controlled over three-quarters of the voting machine market.

Sep. 13, 2010

Brennan Center Report Calls for Publicly Available National Database of Voting System Malfunctions

Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law issues a report calling for a publicly available national database containing information on voting system failures and vulnerabilities. The report finds that the same malfunctions occur frequently with the same machines in different jurisdictions. Election officials are often not aware of vulnerabilities because vendors are under no legal obligation to notify election officials of past system problems.

2011

Security Experts Hack Voting Machines by Remote Control

“Voting machines used by as many as a quarter of American voters heading to the polls in 2012 can be hacked with just $10.50 in parts and an 8th grade science education, according to computer science and security experts at the Vulnerability Assessment Team at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois. The experts say the newly developed hack could change voting results while leaving absolutely no trace of the manipulation behind…

The team’s video demonstrates how inserting the inexpensive electronic device into the voting machine can offer a ‘bad guy’ virtually complete control over the machine. A cheap remote control unit can enable access to the voting machine from up to half a mile away.”

Nov. 6, 2012

Long Lines Due to Voting Machine Malfunctions in 2012 Presidential Election

The elections were rife with long lines and some glitches with voting machines. A YouTube video showing a Pennsylvania voting e-voting touch screen machine “flipping” a vote from Obama to Romney went viral. Machine breakdowns in Virginia caused three to five hour long lines that prompted some polling places to remain open late. South Carolina reported too few machines as well as broken machines. Malfunctioning machines were reported in Georgia, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Colorado.

2013

New York City Returns to Lever Machines for Primary Election and Runoffs

Approximately 5,100 lever voting machines that weigh over 800 pounds and have more than 20,000 parts each, have been brought out of storage for the New York City primary election and runoffs and made ready for the general election in November. The lever machines are being used because the $95 million electronic system caused chaos in the 2012 election including a 72 day long recount involving litigation for the special election for State Senate in Brooklyn.

July 29, 2017

First-Ever Voting Machine “Hackathon” Reveals Many Vulnerabilities in Electronic Voting Machines and Poll Systems

“E-voting machines and voter registration systems used widely in the United States and other countries’ elections can readily be hacked—in some cases with less than two hours’ work. This conclusion emerged from a three-day-long hackathon at the Def Con security conference in Las Vegas… Def Con, an annual computer hacking conference celebrating its 25th year, hosted its first Voting Machine Hacking Village this year.

In it, conference attendees were given access to many of the most popular voting machines and voter registration tracking systems in use around the world today. And before the Hacking Village organizers were even finished with their opening morning introductory remarks, a Danish hacker in the audience had already broken into one of the target machines wirelessly. Soon after on the same morning, a second group in the room wirelessly hacked into a popular electronic poll book system, responsible for storing and maintaining voter registration information. In total, the inaugural e-voting hackathon turned up at least 18 new vulnerabilities to e-voting and e-poll book systems.”

August 13, 2020The United States Postal Service (USPS) filed a patent application called “Secure Voting System” to use blockchain technology to streamline and secure mail-in voting.
The
‘Secure Voting System’ patent application
, published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, describes how the same technology that supports bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies could be used to “track and secure the vote by mail system”.It describes using blockchain technology to secure mail-in voting: A registered voter receives a computer-readable code in the mail and confirms identity and confirms correct ballot information in an election. The system separates voter identification and votes to ensure vote anonymity, and stores votes on a distributed ledger in a blockchain.